A discussion on how the various official animal protection agencies of societies are designed to promote and faucilitate the torture an genocide of animals.

What is the RSPCA?
According to society, it is a "Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals".

Is this an accurate and Truth-based definition? No.

Why?

[1] All societies are based on the lie that humans are superior to animals and have more right than any animal does.
[2] All societies promote animal abuse and genocide.
[3] Human societies cannot currently exist (as they are now) without committing genocide against superior races such as chickens.
[4] The RSPCA is directly responsible for murdering Superior life-forms every day.
Here are two examples to support [4].

[4] (1) The unjustifiable murder of "homeless" animals, using the insane and lie-based terminology of "putting to sleep" or "putting down".

Why is it unjustifiable? Because the animal is doing nothing to warrant being murdered. The idea that it is "homeless", and therefore deserves to die, is insane. All animals are natrually homeless. Therefore, there can be no obligation on ay animal from human society to have a home.

The cell that the animal is kept in is not defined by RSPCA as a home, when it clearly is its current home.

The RSPCA will try and say that it "has to" kill the animal, because it has nowhere to go.
Who says it has nowhere to go? Who says it has to go anywhere from where it is now? It makes no sense.
Another argument is that the animal would not survive if it was "released", and must therefore die.
This argument is insane. The animal has zero chance of survival if it is murdered. ANY chance is better than zero chance.

This is another way that re-incarnation and the god myth, being malevolent and immoral, manifests itself. They will say "Oh, but it will come back and have a better life" We are doing it a favour".
There is no evidence to support or even suggest that this insane theory is True. It is not Truth, it is a lie, and all lies are malevolent.

The animals could be driven elsewhere and let go, in a nature reserve or a special island, kept at society’s expense etc. Because it could do otherwise, it cannot claim that it "has to" murder the animal. BUT society refuses to do this!!!

It wants to give the legal permission for these employees to murder animals, because it knows unless they take thier murderous intent out on animals, they might take it out on humans. This is also wrong, because humans are toxic and Truth-hating and are inferior in brain function to animals.

[4] (2) The support of humane treatment of animals, such as the exploitation and genocide of chickens.

The RSPCA promotes and supports the caging and genocide of chickens for unnatural food support levels for human society. By setting an acceptable and humane standard of same, it actually is saying "It’s OK to do so. Please continue, you meet the huamne standards."
Indeed, they do meet the humane standards. The key word being humane. Only humans commit genocide, eat animals that are not part of thier natural diet, unnecesarily torture and kill other life forms….breed millions of other life forms in cages for thier whole lives based on race etc. etc. etc.

**So, to be humane towards animals means to be cruel, commit murder and genocide against them, force them to live a life against nature, mutilate thier genitals etc. etc.**

For space reasons, points [1], [2] and [3] will be argued at a later post.

So a Truth-based definition would be :
Facist Societal Organisation of Animal Genocide and Brutalisation Support.
Or the FSOAHBS.